Legal Opinion
Kostohryz v. Hursh
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 6, 1971No. 3-70-Civ.-220PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*320MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DEVITT, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs, recipients of Aid to Families with Dependent Children benefits,1 bring this class action2 to challenge Minnesota’s public welfare regulation relating to stepfathers. Plaintiffs contend that Section VII — 2224.04 of the Minnesota Public Welfare Manual, the “stepfather” regulation, is inconsistent with Part A of Subchapter IV of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 601-610, with the regulations promulgated thereunder, particularly 45 C.F.R. § 203.1, and with the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rosen v. HurshCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Holland v. ParkerDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1971
- Hagen v. St. Paul Board of Education of Independent School District No. 625District Court, D. Minnesota · 1971
- Rosen v. HurshDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1971
- Rosen v. HurshCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972