Legal Opinion
United States v. John Francis Harrington
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 6, 2005No. 03-30413PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.
Federal prisoner John Francis Harrington filed a “Motion for New Trial Based on Newly Discovered Evidence” under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33, after he had unsuccessfully pursued a direct appeal and a habeas corpus petition. Harrington had been convicted of three counts of distribution of LSD and one count of possession of LSD with an intent to distribute. Harrington appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Appointment of Counsel” in connection with that motion for a new trial. We hold that he was not entitled to appointed counsel…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. John E. Kenny, Trenton P. Oelberg, and William L. Parker, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Servando Reyes-Alvarado, United States of America v. Martin Gonzalez-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- James W. Menefield v. Robert G. Borg, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Lewis R. KulczykCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Anthony Smith v. Ron DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Brent WilkesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.