Legal Opinion · Dissent

Howarth v. State, Public Defender Agency

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1996No. S-4333Published

1DissentCompton, Justice

I disagree with the court’s causation analysis, with its collateral estoppel analysis, and with its holding that a person convicted of a crime cannot recover damages from an attorney whose malpractice contributed to the person’s incarceration.

I. CAUSATION

In September 19811 Howarth entered a plea of nolo contendere to the charge of sexual assault in the first degree, a violation of AS 11.41.410,2 and received a ten-year presumptive sentence.3 The superior court later found that Howarth had established ineffective assistance of counsel and granted Howarth’s motion to withdraw the plea he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shaw v. State, Department of AdministrationAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Scott v. RobertsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Vincent Ex Rel. Staton v. Fairbanks Memorial HospitalAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Coney v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API