Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Quartapella

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1988No. 1426PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Joseph Quartapella was tried non-jury and was found guilty of theft by deception. Post-trial motions were denied, and he was sentenced to make restitution and undergo imprisonment for not less than six months nor more than twelve months. On direct appeal, he argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict and that the sentence was excessive. We disagree and affirm the judgment of sentence.

Theft by deception is defined at 18 Pa.C.S. § 3922 as follows:(a) A person is guilty of theft if he intentionally obtains or withholds property of another by deception. A…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SessomsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. HarperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. MeredithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. RussellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ParkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Commonwealth v. AtwoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. GrahamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Com. v. Emeigh, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. AtwoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API