Legal Opinion
Woodruff v. Brady
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 28, 1937No. 27604PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
The defendant in error, Mamie A. Brady, brought this action in the district court of Carter county against plaintiff in error, Leonard J. Woodruff, to cancel an oil 'and gas mining lease. Judgment was for the plaintiff, and defendant has appealed. The parties are designated as they appeared at the tricil.
The lease was executed by plaintiff January 9-, 1926, for a term of five years “and as long thereafter as oil or gas, or either of them, is produced from s'aid land by the lessee.”
Plaintiff alleges that the lease has expired, become inoperative and null and void, and is now a cloud on her…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gypsy Oil Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Anthis v. Sullivan Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Western States Oil & Land Co. v. HelmsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Security Nat. Bank v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
3Cited by27 opinions
- Garcia v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Stewart v. Amerada Hess Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Brown v. HaightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Cotner v. WarrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Samuel G. Whitaker and Elizabeth Whitaker v. Texaco Inc. (Formerly Named the Texas Company), a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.