Succession of Savoy
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM A. CULPEPPER, Judge, Pro Tern.
The appellant, George Woodrow, alleges that he is the informally acknowledged illegitimate son of Kenneth Savoy and is, therefore, entitled to a forced portion of Savoy’s estate. Opposing Woodrow in his claim are the proponents and opponents of Kenneth Savoy’s will. An exception of prescription under LSA-C.C. art. 209 was filed to Woodrow’s suit. The trial court originally sustained the exception, then recalled its judgment and referred it to trial on the merits. The will’s opponents and proponents settled their dispute at trial, and jointly resisted…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Griffin v. SUCCESSION OF BRANCH EX REL. SMITHSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- In Re WildeboerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- In the Matter of ThomasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- Thomas v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCES v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Succession of CobbLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- In re the Succession of CobbLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997