Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Succession of Cobb

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 1997No. 96 CA 1249Published

1DissentWhipple, Judge

I respectfully disagree with the majority’s holding that a baptismal certificate which is not signed by the parent can never fulfill the requirements for acknowledgment pursuant to LSA-C.C. art. 203. In reaching this conclusion, the majority relies, in part, on cases which held that a birth certificate must be signed by the parent to constitute an acknowledgment under LSA-C.C. art. 203. See In the Matter of Succession of Brown, 522 So.2d 1382, 1385 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1988); Succession of Savoy, 511 So.2d 59, 61 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1987). In relying on these cases, the majority states that it is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wells v. White-Grandin Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Stewart v. Parish of Jefferson DavisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. In the Matter of Succession of TheriotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. In re the Succession of BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Lewis v. Sorrel Electrical Contractors, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API