Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Abbott

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 30, 1898PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Original Proceeding in Habeas Corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Tabsnev, J.:

In a cause pending in the district court of Oklahoma county, wherein Nathan & Manhei-mer were plaintiffs, and Chandler 0. Abbott, the petitioner, and others, were defendants, the plaintiffs gave notice of the taking of depositions before the probate judge of Oklahoma county. A subpoena was duly issued by said judge, and served upon the petitioner, requiring him to appear before the said judge of probate to give testimony in said cause. In obedience to the subpoena he appreared,- but refused to be sworn or to tesitfy —first, because he was a defendant in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re HuronSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  2. Central Loan & Trust Co. v. Campbell Commission Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  3. Ex parte PriestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Landon v. MoreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. State Ex Rel. Westerheide v. ShillingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Waugh v. DibbensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. In re HammondNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Tootle v. PayneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API