Legal Opinion

Atlantic Contracting Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 4, 1899No. 21285PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On the claimant's Motion. The Reporters' statement of. the case: The facts in regard to the motion appear sufficiently in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWeldon, J.

On April 19,1899, the claimant filed a petition against the United States as defendants, in which it is in substance alleged, that claimant is a corporation created and existing under the laws of the State of West Virginia; .that its principal place of business is in the city of New York; and that it has always borne true faith and allegiance to the United States.

In the second paragraph it is alleged that Congress, cn June 3,1896, by the act known as the. river and harbor act, authorized, among other public works, the following:

“ Improving Cumberland Sound, Georgia: Continuing improvement,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Union Rolling Mill Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Winans v. . WinansNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Tingue v. . Village of Port ChesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Schmick v. NoelTexas Supreme Court · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Huske v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1910
  2. Skinner & Eddy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1923
  3. Health Republic Insurance Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  4. Perfect Form Manufacturing LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API