Legal Opinion

Huske v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 12, 1910No. 27389PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowRy, J.

Plaintiff obtained a judgment in this court June 11, 1906. Two days thereafter defendants made a motion for new trial and soon thereafter this motion of the defendants was allowed. Afterwards, March 5,190?, claimant, entered a motion to discontinue the cause, but almost contemporaneously (next day) defendants filed a counterclaim much in excess of the judgment which had been obtained by the claimant. March 7, 1907, the court overruled the claimant’s motion to discontinue. .

*37The present motion on the part of the plaintiff is to set aside the order of the court overruling the previous motion of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Atlantic Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Keith v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  2. Skinner & Eddy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API