Legal Opinion

Haag v. Gorman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The defendant’s rights rest upon the quitclaim deed for a nominal consideration under such circumstances that as against the plaintiffs he cannot be considered as a bona fide purchaser for value. Wis. River Land Co. v. Selover, 135 Wis. 594, 116 N. W. 265.

Attention is at once directed to the equities existing in favor of plaintiffs as against their grantor, for, under the circumstances, the defendant stands here in the grantor’s place. Duncanson, the grantor, acquired the land extending to the lake. He platted it by the same description as that under which he acquired it. The certificates…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barker v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Gove v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Two Rivers Manufacturing Co. v. DayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Wampol v. KountzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Simpson v. BlaisdellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moran v. BurmeisterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. White v. MachovecWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Crane v. EsmondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API