Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Blaisdell

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 14, 1892PublishedCited by 11 opinions

On exceptions. This was a real action in which the jury gave a verdict for the plaintiffs and the defendant excepted. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The demandants claim title to an undivided sixth of a certain half-acre of land which Joseph Blaisdell undertook, by his deed given in 1838, to convey to George Hinman and Samuel P. Donnell, which deed contains the following description:

"Beginning at a pine tree spotted on four sides near the south east corner of the Card lot (so-called) ; thence running west twelve degrees north fifty-six rods to a birch tree spotted on four sides; thence running north twelve degrees east twenty rods to a hemlock stump spotted on four sides ; thence running east twelve degrees south fifty-six rods to a stump…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Marquez v. PadillaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Smith v. FurbishSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894
  3. Coon v. Sonoma Magnesite Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Guillaume v. K. S. D. Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1906
  5. First Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. ElginNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API