Legal Opinion
State v. Health & Human Servs.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 2, 2019No. Case No. 17-cv-05783-HSGPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., United States District Judge
In this case, a coalition of thirteen states and the District of Columbia (collectively, "States" or "Plaintiff States") brought challenges to interim final rules and final rules (collectively, the "Rules") promulgated by federal agencies that create religious and moral exemptions to the contraceptive mandate contained within the Affordable Care Act. See Second Amended Complaint, Dkt. No. 170.1 In January, the Court preliminarily *1064enjoined implementation of the Rules within the Plaintiff States. See Dkt. No. 234. A few weeks later, the Court…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Department of Commerce v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Trump v. HawaiiSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Cindy Garcia v. Google, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- American Encore v. FontesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- Hanieh Alsadat Hedayati, et al. v. Joseph B. EdlowDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. United States Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- State of Washington v. United States Food and Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2023
- Whitman-Walker Clinic, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020