Legal Opinion

Estate of Ridenour v. United States

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided September 25, 2006No. 3:05CV011Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #7); DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #10); JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF; TERMINATION ENTRY

RICE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Eileen M. Leasure (“Plaintiff’ or “Leasure”) brings this litigation as Ex ecutor of the Estate of Charles Ridenour (“Estate”), seeking to recover the sum of $101,206.59 in penalties and interest, which the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) imposed upon the Estate as a result of its failure to file its estate tax return…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API