Legal Opinion

Parker v. Fred Meyer, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 25, 1998No. 9508-06085; CA A94653PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s grant of defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this action for alleged violations of ORS 659.410 (workers’ compensation retaliation) and ORS 659.425 (disability discrimination). He argues that the court incorrectly treated a statement that an administrative law judge (ALJ) made while deciding his workers’ compensation claim as creating issue preclusion on the question of whether defendant terminated him in retaliation for having asserted a workers’ compensation claim. We agree and therefore reverse.

We state the facts most favorably to plaintiff. See…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Stanich v. Precision Body and Paint, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Tri-Met, Inc. v. OdighizuwaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McPhail v. Milwaukie Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Beaver v. NPC International, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API