Legal Opinion

Whitehouse v. Hoskins Manufacturing Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1982No. Docket 55443PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to defendant, plaintiff’s former employer, and dismissing plaintiff’s complaint for breach of contract.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff gave up a secured position in the production unit of defendant’s Mio plant in return for a managerial position on the condition that plaintiff could return to the production unit upon request. The complaint further alleges that plaintiff was discharged because he requested to return to the production unit. Defendant filed an answer denying most of plaintiff’s allegations…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. J. I. Case Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Sventko v. Kroger Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Kaleva-Norman-Dickson School District No. 6 v. Kalevanorman-Dickson School Teachers' Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Rowe v. Noren Pattern & Foundry Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Horn v. CookeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Hetrick v. FriedmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Burrows v. bidigare/bublys, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Burrows v. bidigare/bublys, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Champion v. Kenowa Hills Public SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API