Legal Opinion

Claim of Rourke v. Reichhold Chemical, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 30, 1987PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCasey, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed February 12, 1986.

The employer and its carrier object to the Workers’ Compensation Board’s finding of permanent total disability due to lead poisoning, arguing that the decision is not supported by substantial evidence and that they were denied certain basic due process rights. We find no merit in either argument.

In reaching its decision, the Board expressly relied upon the reports of three physicians. The employer argues that since the reports reveal conflicting opinions as to whether claimant was totally disabled due to lead…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Claim of House v. International Talc Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Claim of Torres v. T A D Technical Services Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Claim of Coluccio v. Aenco, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Claim of Grandinetti v. Syracuse UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Claim of Spangenberg v. View Point Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Claim of Moore v. RPM Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API