Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Hickey

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1982No. 81-1885PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant asserts here only that he is not the person charged and that he was not in the state of Georgia when the alleged offenses occurred.

This court has held in In re Rowe (1981), 67 Ohio St. 2d 115, in paragraph three of the syllabus, as follows:

“3. When the invalidity of arrest under the Governor’s warrant is asserted by a petitioner in habeas corpus upon the ground that the petitioner was not a fugitive from justice, in that he was not in the demanding state on or about the date of the offense charged, the burden is upon the petitioner to rebut the presumption that petitioner is prima…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Complaint in Habeas Corpus of RoweOhio Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barrila v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MortonOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In Re Habeas Corpus for TerryOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. State, Ex Rel. Gilpin v. StokesOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API