Stanton v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.
Defendant Banque Romande, a Geneva, Switzerland-based bank, moves to dismiss the above-entitled action, including both the complaint and cross-complaint, or in lieu thereof to quash the return of service of the Order of Attachment, on the ground that New York’s at tachment statute — Section 6201 of the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules 1 — is unconstitutional. In the alternative, defendant seeks a more definite statement pursuant to Rule 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons stated herein, these motions are denied.
I…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sugar v. Curtis Circulation CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Gann v. Bernzomatic CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pereira v. Centel Corp. (In Re Argo Communications Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- FRA S. P. A. v. Surg-O-Flex of America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Bunker Exploration Co. v. Clarke (In Re Bunker Exploration Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1984
- Seafood Imports, Inc. v. A. J. Cunningham Packing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Scarbrough v. R-Way Furniture Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.