Legal Opinion

Stanton v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 22, 1975No. 74 Civ. 791PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.

Defendant Banque Romande, a Geneva, Switzerland-based bank, moves to dismiss the above-entitled action, including both the complaint and cross-complaint, or in lieu thereof to quash the return of service of the Order of Attachment, on the ground that New York’s at tachment statute — Section 6201 of the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules 1 — is unconstitutional. In the alternative, defendant seeks a more definite statement pursuant to Rule 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons stated herein, these motions are denied.

I…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Sugar v. Curtis Circulation CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  5. Gann v. Bernzomatic CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pereira v. Centel Corp. (In Re Argo Communications Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  2. FRA S. P. A. v. Surg-O-Flex of America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  3. Bunker Exploration Co. v. Clarke (In Re Bunker Exploration Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1984
  4. Seafood Imports, Inc. v. A. J. Cunningham Packing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  5. Scarbrough v. R-Way Furniture Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API