Legal Opinion
People v. Bishop
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided September 2, 2014PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*646OPINION OF THE COURT
Ernest F. Hart J.
The defendant is charged with unlawful solicitation of ground transportation services.
The defendant, in an omnibus motion, seeks: (1) to compel a bill of particulars and discovery; (2) dismissal of the charge; (3) a CPL 240A3/Sandoval hearing; and (4) reservation of rights.
The People filed a response to the defense motion.
The defendant’s omnibus motion is decided as follows:
Motion to Compel a Bill of Particulars and Discovery
The defendant moves to compel a bill of particulars and discovery, based on the People’s failure to comply with his request for same.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. SteadmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. Hilario (Agustin)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017