Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Levan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1885No. 17PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Berks county: Of January Term 1885, No. 17. This was an action on t-he case by Hannah Levan against Ephraim Armstrong, the prothonotary of Berks comity, to recover damages caused the plaintiff by the wrongful and negligent failure of defendant to properly index a judgment entere I by the plaintiff against Enoch Rohrbach. The defendant- pleaded tlie general issue and the Statute of Limitations.

Read the full summary

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Berks county: Of January Term 1885, No. 17. This was an action on t-he case by Hannah Levan against Ephraim Armstrong, the prothonotary of Berks comity, to recover damages caused the plaintiff by the wrongful and negligent failure of defendant to properly index a judgment entere I by the plaintiff against Enoch Rohrbach. The defendant- pleaded tlie general issue and the Statute of Limitations. On the trial, before Hag-enman, P. J., it appeared that on April 9,1874, the plaintiff entered tlie judgment in question in tlie Court of Common Pleas of Berks…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Paxson

The defendant below was sued for breach of official duty as prothonotary in not properly entering a judgment, by means whereof its lien was postponed and the plaintiff suffered a loss.

The defendant pleaded the general issue and the Statute of Limitations. To meet the plea of the statute the plaintiff called a witness, who testified as follows: “ After I discovered that there was no judgment in favor of Hannah Levan against Enoch Rohrbach, but there was one against Enoch Rothenberger, which I knew from the number to be meant as the one against Rohrbach, I went to see Air. Armstrong in…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. ScheuerNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Guy v. Stoecklein Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Carruth v. FritchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. McKay v. McCarthySupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. Wood & Selick, Inc. v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API