Legal Opinion
Zane Floyd v. Timothy Filson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 11, 2019No. 14-99012PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ZANE FLOYD, No. 14-99012 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:06-cv-00471- PMP-CWH TIMOTHY FILSON; ADAM PAUL LAXALT, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted January 31, 2019 San Francisco, California Filed October 11, 2019 Before: Marsha S. Berzon, John B. Owens, and Michelle T. Friedland, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Friedland 2 FLOYD V. FILSON SUMMARY * Habeas Corpus / Death…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Charles Vandross v. Bryan StirlingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- Reno v. Ron DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- John Bejarano v. William ReubartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- Chad Lee v. Ryan ThornellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Alberto Julio Garcia a/k/a Alberto J. Garcia a/k/a Alberto Garcia v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2023
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.