Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Day

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided March 15, 1974No. 2:04-misc-00009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERMANSDORFER, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court to resolve an issue of first impression in this Circuit. See: United States v. Jamison, 493 F.2d 823 (6th Cir. 1974). The precise question presented is whether individuals convicted of narcotics related offenses prior to May 1, 1971 and sentenced under the provision of 26 U.S.C. § 7237(d) are eligible for parole pursu ant to 18 U.S.C. § 4202 following the repeal of the sentencing statute. Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, § 1101(b), 84 Stat. 1292. There is presently a split of authority among the Circuits…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Bradley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Hamm v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. ReisingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. United States v. Charles B. Bradley, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gill v. Missouri State Bd. of Probation and ParoleDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1987
  2. United States v. FigueroaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  3. United States v. Clyde TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API