Legal Opinion

Reheis v. Baxley Creosoting & Osmose Wood Preserving Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 1, 2004No. A04A0170PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MIKELL, Judge.

OCGA § 12-8-96.1 (a) of the Georgia Hazardous Site Response Act (“HSRA”) permits the state to recover the reasonable costs incurred in cleaning up hazardous waste sites, as well as attorney fees and punitive damages. In this case of first impression, we hold that defendants sued under Code section 12-8-96.1 (a) have no right to a jury trial on the issue of whether the actual costs were reasonable, but they may demand a jury trial on the issue of punitive damages. We further conclude that cost recovery determinations made by the Environmental Protection Division (“EPD”) of the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Flint River Steamboat Co. v. FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
  2. Six Flags Over Georgia II, L.P. v. KullSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  3. Bentley v. ChastainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  4. Hospital Authority v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  5. Browning-Ferris Industries of Illinois, Inc. v. Richard Ter MaatCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Elliott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  2. Bearoff v. CratonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  3. Walker County v. Tri-State CrematoryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. City of Rincon v. CouchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. Elliott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API