Legal Opinion

The Torrington Company v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 3, 1991No. 91-1020PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the August 3, 1990, judgment of the Court of International Trade which held that the Department of Commerce has the authority to modify a petition’s description of “class or kind” in an antidumping investigation when it finds that the petition has described more than one class or kind of merchandise, and that its determination was supported by substantial evidence. Torrington Co. v. United States, 745 F.Supp. 718 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1990). We affirm.

BACKGROUND

On March 31, 1988, the Torrington Company filed a petition with the Department of Commerce…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
  3. American Permac, Inc. And Boewe Maschinenfabrik, Gmbh, Boewe Systems & MacHinery Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Tehnoimportexport, UCF America Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
  2. Minebea Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
  3. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
  4. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
  5. NMB Singapore Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API