Hicks v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Concurrence
Judge MANNHEIMER,
concurring.
There are significant problems - with Hicks's conviction in this case, but those problems are not raised in Hicks's appeal.
As explained in Judge Allard's lead opinion, Hicks raises one argument on appeal: the argument that, absent an explicit grant of authority by the legislature, .a court has no authority to prohibit a defendant from contacting the victim of the alleged offense while the defendant is in jail awaiting trial,. I join Judge Allard in rejecting. that argument-but I nevertheless have reservations about the validity of Hicks's conviction.
The fact that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bennett v. BennettAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- John v. BakerAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Luckart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2012