Legal Opinion

Ragan v. Citizens' State Bank of Foraker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 29, 1913No. 2651PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from County Court, Osage County; ■C. T. Bennett, Judge. Action by D. M. Eagan against the Citizens’ State Bank of Foraker and G. E. Maddox. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The plaintiff in error, D. M. Ragan, as plaintiff, sued the 'defendants in error, Citizens’ State Bank of Foraker, and G. R. Maddox as defendants, in replevin to recover possession of four horses, two of which were called roans. The defendant bank with its codefendant, O. R. Maddox, as constable, claimed said horses by virtue of a mortgage to the said bank by B. L. Ragan, the son of the plaintiff. By answer they put in issue (1) the plaintiff’s ownership of said horses; and (2) further pleaded estoppel against-said plaintiff.

Over' the objection of the plaintiff, at the instance of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holt v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Nelson v. IversonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
  3. Avery v. ClemonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1847
  4. Lockwood Bros. v. Frisco Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. First Nat. Bank of Holdenville v. KissareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Yonkman v. HarveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Jones v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2007
  3. Christianson v. ShepherdWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Pierce v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Cravens v. HollidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API