Legal Opinion

Piotrowski v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 6, 1990No. C6-88-1039, C0-88-1148PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Justice.

These consolidated appeals by the State of Minnesota and the Commissioner of Public Safety present issues concerning the authority of a Minnesota police officer to pursue a driver across the border into North Dakota after observing the driver commit a traffic offense in Minnesota in the officer’s presence. In both the DWI prosecution under Minn.Stat. § 169.121 (1986) and the implied consent proceeding under section 169.123, the driver, William Mark Piotrowski, sought to suppress all evidence that was the fruit of the pursuit and stop on the ground that the officer did not have…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State, Department of Public Safety v. JuncewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Smith v. HubbardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. State v. SchinzingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. State v. LucasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State v. FilipiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State, Lake Minnetonka Conservation District v. HornerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Davis v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. EveryIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. United States v. Bruce A. BenjaminCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. State v. TorgersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API