Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Missoula v. Mountain Water Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 2016No. DA 15-0375Published

1DissentJustice McKINNON

¶134 The Court errs in applying the “more necessary” requirement of § 70-30-11 1(1)(c), MCA, in a condemnation proceeding where the public use for public or private ownership is the same. The confusion in the trial proceedings and this Court appears to have originated with our incorrect analysis in Mountain Water I and our departure from well-established precedent holding that subsection (c) does not apply when the proposed second appropriation does not contemplate a change in public use. See Montana Power Co. v. Burlington Northern, 272 Mont. 224, 900 P.2d 888 (1995); Mont. Talc Co., v.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Co. v. Montana Union Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Matter of City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Chicago & Western Indiana RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Duck River Electric Membership Corp. v. City of ManchesterTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State Ex Rel. Missouri Cities Water Co. v. HodgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API