Legal Opinion · Dissent

Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. Cather

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1929No. 13,123Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion.

Nichols, J.

I cannot agree to the majority opinion herein, and therefore I dissent. I am compelled to challenge some of the statements of fact in the majority opinion as misleading without the aid of photographs in evidence, and I shall, therefore, make such photographs a part of this dissenting opinion, with the hope that they may be made a part thereof as published. The following is a photograph taken with the camera located 60 feet north of the east-bound track on which the train was running to the east, and with the camera looking in the direction from which the train…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co. v. HedgesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. StommelIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Richmond Gas Co. v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API