Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. Cather
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion.
Nichols, J.
I cannot agree to the majority opinion herein, and therefore I dissent. I am compelled to challenge some of the statements of fact in the majority opinion as misleading without the aid of photographs in evidence, and I shall, therefore, make such photographs a part of this dissenting opinion, with the hope that they may be made a part thereof as published. The following is a photograph taken with the camera located 60 feet north of the east-bound track on which the train was running to the east, and with the camera looking in the direction from which the train…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co. v. HedgesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. StommelIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Richmond Gas Co. v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.