Legal Opinion

People v. Hacken

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1968PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. Irwin Shapiro, J.

Defendant applies for an order permitting an inspection of the Grand Jury minutes or, in the alternative for an order dismissing the indictment upon the ground that the evidence before the Grand Jury was insufficient to warrant its return.

In an eight-count indictment, defendant is charged with forgery in the second degree for having, with intent to defraud, *951forged and uttered four separate writings. A copy of each writing is set forth or referred to in each applicable count. Each of the writings consists of an order form for certain merchandise clipped from a newspaper advertisement in which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. DalesNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. People v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. People v. DalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  5. People v. ShermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. KirkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. In re D.U.New York City Family Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API