Legal Opinion

People v. Dales

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1955PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.

On this appeal from a judgment convicting defendant of the crime of uttering a forged instrument with intent to defraud (Penal Law, § 887), the primary question posed concerns the admissibility of evidence of similar crimes.

Defendant was in the business of buying and selling used cars in Oneonta, New York, and, in connection with that business, had almost daily dealings with the Citizens ’ National Bank. The transaction of which he stands convicted involved a promissory note for $700; it purported to be signed by an employee, Utter, as maker, and carried defendant’s own signature as indorser.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. People v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. People v. . EverhardtNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. People v. . MarrinNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. People v. AlvinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. AllweissNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. People v. SchwartzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. People v. VailsNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API