Legal Opinion

United States v. Charles A. D'amato, A/K/A 'Chazzo' Appeal of Richard Mannetta A/K/A 'Ritchie'

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 25, 1970No. 18532_1PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

STALEY, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, Richard Mannetta, pleaded guilty in the district court to a charge that he had violated 18 U.S.C. § 1952. 1 Prior to his guilty plea, appellant had moved to dismiss all charges against him on the grounds that § 1952 is unconstitutional and that it violates his right to due process as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment. This motion was denied by the district court in an opinion and order dated January 8, 1970. When the appellant entered his guilty plea, he explicitly reserved the right to appeal the resultant conviction on the ground that §…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Haynes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Siler v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Murdock v. City of MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. Martin F. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. PolizziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. ForsytheCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. Irving B. Kahn and Teleprompter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API