Legal Opinion
Charles Friend & Co. v. Goldsmith & Seidel Co.
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 1923No. 14748PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn
Charles Friend & Co., a corporation, began a suit in attachment in the municipal court of Chicago against Goldsmith & Seidel Co., a corporation, the affidavit charging that the defendant was not a resident of this State and that its place of residence was 100 South Commercial street, St. Louis, Missouri. The writ of attachment was served on Guggenheim Bros., a corporation, as garnishee, and the defendant moved to dismiss the cause and quash the attachment. The court sustained the motion, discharged the garnishee, quashed the attachment and dismissed the suit, rendering judgment against the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Ex Parte SchollenbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Orient Insurance v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Mineral Point Railroad v. KeepIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Furst v. BradyIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
- Real v. KimAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- LeBlanc v. G.D. Searle & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Mitchell v. Union Bag Paper CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Martin Garbe, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Mattoon City Drugs, Inc. v. Humiston, Keeling and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.