School District No. 4 v. School District No. 84
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Boone Chancery Court; T. Haden Humphreys, Chancellor; Equity will not enjoin a judgment merely because it is void.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Boone Chancery Court; T. Haden Humphreys, Chancellor; Equity will not enjoin a judgment merely because it is void. The plaintiff must show in his bill for injunction that, he had no adequate remedy at law, either by appeal from the judgment, or by certiorari; or by application to the court which rendered the -judgment, or in other legal manner. 48 Ark. 510; Id. 331; 58 Ark. 316; 82 Ark. 330; 55 Ark. 52. In this case injunction was sought on the ground that no notice was given of the application for the order. That such notice was not given appears on the face of the order and upon…
1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.
This is a controversy between two school districts of Boone County, Nos. 84 and 4, over the district school tax assessed against the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company on its roadbed and right of way located within the territorial boundaries of the first-mentioned district* J. C. Jones resided within the bounds of District No. 84, and owned a tract of land therein. During the year 1898 he obtained an order of the county court for educational purposes transferring his children and district school tax to District No. 4, which was an adjoining district. Subsequently the railway…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Krause v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Jones v. FloydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- White v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928