Legal Opinion

Copper Queen Consolidated Mining Co. v. Stratton

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1915No. Civil No. 1430Published

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Pima. Wm. F. Cooper, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.

The appellant on the fourteenth day of May,-1913, filed a notice of intention to apply for a United States mineral patent for a group of mining locations including the Eagle No. 2 location. The Eagle No. 2 was located by F. Geesaman and Frank Helig on January 1, 1903. During the-year 1905 F. Geesaman acquired Frank Helig’s estate in the claim, and thereafter, on July 23, 1912, he caused to be recorded an amended notice of said location. The description and 'boundaries contained in the amended location notice so posted and -recorded covered the ground described in the first notice, and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Del Monte Mining & Milling Co. v. Last Chance Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Hall v. ArnottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Strepey v. StarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  4. Bismark Mountain Gold Mining Co. v. North Sunbeam Gold Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  5. McEvoy v. HymanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1885

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API