Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Hodge

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 12, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Notice. Evidence. Practice. Continuance. Before Judge Fain. Bartow superior court. July term, 1887. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

It is true that a notice in writing to sue, which a surety has given to the creditor, is the best evidence of its own contents, and notice to produce it at the trial ought to be given as preliminary to the introducton of secondary evidence. This is the general rule. Frank vs. Longstreet, 44 Ga. 178; Lathrop vs. Mitchell, 47 Ga. 610. But there is only a feeble presumption that such a paper has been preserved by the creditor, and when that presumption has been overcome by the creditor’s declarations that the document is lost, that after diligent search it could not be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frank v. Longstreet, Sedgwick & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1871
  2. Trustees of Chester Church v. BlountSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  3. J. W. Lathrop & Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Middlebrooks v. CabanissSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  3. Leverett v. TiftCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API