Legal Opinion

Clarence Williams and Arlene Jackson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 24, 1969No. 22870, 22871PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:

Williams and Jackson were jointly tried and each was convicted for concealing illegally imported heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 174. 1 Both of them appeal, raising the issues: (1) Did the District Court err in denying their motions to suppress the heroin as the product of an illegal search? (2) Did the District Court err in denying their motions for acquittal based upon the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the jury’s implied finding of possession?

We hold: (1) The search was not illegal because Williams' arrest was not as a matter of law a pretext for the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. Juan Castillo, Aka: Luis Hong Rojas, United States of America v. Antonio De La RentaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Kirkpatrick v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970
  4. United States v. Servando Reyes-Alvarado, United States of America v. Martin Gonzalez-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Enrique EspinosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API