Legal Opinion

In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 117 Lacy S. Hair

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 5, 1989No. 504A88PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER OF CENSURE.

The conduct of the respondent in this proceeding, which formed the basis of the Commission’s recommendation that he be censured, involved: (1) attempting an assignation with a woman, convicted of prostitution and on probation, and giving the impression that he could assist her with her legal problems; (2) changing verdicts in motor vehicle violation cases upon ex parte communications from defendants without providing the state an opportunity to be heard; (3) making an inappropriate advance toward a woman detective employed by the Fayetteville Police Department; (4) making…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 170, BullockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. In re PoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2021
  3. In re PoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2021
  4. Khan v. Marconi Communications, Inc.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2006
  5. Shepherd v. Nat'l Federation of Independent Bus.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API