Legal Opinion

Cain v. Sheraton Perimeter Park South Hotel

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 20, 1991No. 1901319PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in entering a summary judgment in favor of the defendants on the plaintiffs' claim that they were liable to them because of a restaurant's serving him raw oysters that he alleges were infected with hepatitis.

On February 10, 1986, around 8:00 p.m., Nathaniel E. Cain, the plaintiff, arrived at the Sheraton Perimeter Park South Hotel to meet some business associates. While he was at the Sheraton, he consumed approximately three dozen complimentary raw oysters, and bought approximately $38.00 worth of liquor. Several other members of his…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Wilson v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Casrell v. Altec Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In re Myford Touch Consumer LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  2. Spain v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Vesta Fire Ins. Corp. v. Milam & Co. Constr., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. Ex Parte Elba Gen. Hosp. and Nursing Home, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Bell v. T.R. Miller Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API