Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. West

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1904No. 4,538PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Erom Grant Circuit Court; E. A. Huffman, Special Judge. Action by Joseph A. West against the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHenley, C. J.

Action by appellee to- recover damages for the death of his son, caused by the alleged negligent act of the appellant.

About 2':30 o’clock a. m. on the 2d day of August, 1901, one Prank West was driving north on a highway running through the village of ATier, which said highway crossed appellant’s railway track at right angles in said village. The said West was in a rubber-tired, top buggy, drawn by one horse, and, as he passed over appellant’s railroad track, was struck by a locomotive and train of cars running at the rate of about thirty-five miles an hour, by which collision he was killed.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Malott v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Mann v. Belt Railroad & Stock Yard Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Smith v. Wabash RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. StickIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Cole v. SearfossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Waking v. Cincinnati, Indianapolis & Western RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. ReynoldsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Fort Wayne & Northern Indiana Traction Co. v. SchoeffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API