Legal Opinion

In Re City of Lancaster

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided April 18, 2007No. 05-07-00196-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion By

Justice MOSELEY.

In this mandamus proceeding, the City of Lancaster contends the trial court abused its discretion by entering a final judgment ordering it to reinstate a firefighter, David Clopton, within ten days of the date of the judgment, and by issuing a writ of mandamus to enforce the judgment while post-trial motions were pending and before the expiration of the City’s time period for perfecting an appeal. We conditionally grant the writ in part.

I. BACKGROUND

The City fired Clopton for failing to pass a random drug test. He sought a review of that decision under the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Anderson v. City of Seven PointsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. In Re Cerberus Capital Management, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Liberty National Fire Insurance Co. v. AkinTexas Supreme Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re City of CressonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  2. City of Rio Grande City v. BFI Waste Services of Texas, LPCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. City of Beaumont and Kenneth R. Williams v. Caleb Fenter, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2023
  4. TriOak Bar D, LLC v. Guadalupe County, TexasDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2025
  5. in Re City of Cresson, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API