David Gould v. County of Fresno
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID GOULD, No. 1:24-cv-00699-JLT-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 13 v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE DENIED 14 COUNTY OF FRESNO, (ECF No. 31) 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff is a civil detainee under the Sexually Violent Predator Act, Cal. Welfare 19 & Institutions Code § 6600, et seq. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Oscar W. Jones v. Lou Blanas County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.