Griffith v. Kerrigan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
Plaintiff brought this action against defendants, Kerrigan and wife and Sutter Butte Canal Company, to recover damages for injury to his peach orchard caused by excessive underground water seepage from adjoining lands which were controlled and operated by the defendants. The demurrer of the Sutter Butte Canal Company was sustained without leave to amend. Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiffs against the Kerrigans for the amount of damage found by the court to have been caused by them. Both the plaintiff and the Kerrigans have appealed from the judgment thus entered.
The injuries to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
- Colonial Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Learned v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Miller v. Highland Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commercial Standard Title Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Fibreboard Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1953
- Conley v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Dauenhauer v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Thorson v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.