Hyde v. German National Bank
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for Waupaca county: Chas. M. Webb, Circuit Judge. On July 25, 1892, plaintiff bought of Bradley & Son the stumpage on certain lands in Michigan, near Paulding, on contract for $12,000, paying $4,000 in cash, giving his notes for the balance-. On December 27, 1892, he sold to the defendant Paulding Lumber Company the stumpage on part of the same lands for $9,000, payable in sis months, with seven per cent, interest, retaining a lien…
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for Waupaca county: Chas. M. Webb, Circuit Judge. On July 25, 1892, plaintiff bought of Bradley & Son the stumpage on certain lands in Michigan, near Paulding, on contract for $12,000, paying $4,000 in cash, giving his notes for the balance-. On December 27, 1892, he sold to the defendant Paulding Lumber Company the stumpage on part of the same lands for $9,000, payable in sis months, with seven per cent, interest, retaining a lien for the entire purchase price. On the same day this contract was modified so that, in case certain of the timber was…
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed June 19, 1902:
Baedeen, J.
The facts in this case are vastly complicated, and the rights of the parties are not easy of ascertainment. The method of trial adopted, and the manner in which the referee’s report was made up¡, has greatly increased the difficulty of following the course of appellant’s argument. The statement of the account by reference to certain exhibits put in evidence has made it necessary to refer to> the testimony at length in order to ascertain and understand the conclusions arrived at. The facts and circumstances in proof have received our…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Furness v. Union National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- MacCarthy v. WhitcombWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- McCalla v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- Raley v. RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- Starrett v. BarberSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1841
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. LindIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Edleman v. EdlemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Moehlenpah v. MayhewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Elmergreen v. WeimerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Mootz v. PetraschefskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.