Legal Opinion

Edleman v. Edleman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1905PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Green county: B. E. DuNwiddie, Circuit Judge. Appeal by defendant from judgment granting divorce at the suit of the wife on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment and habitual drunkenness and dividing the property of the parties between them. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDodge, J.

We are unable to discover, from examination of the evidence, any such clear adverse preponderance as to warrant us in setting aside the conclusion of the court that: habitual intoxication and cruel and inhuman treatment were-proved sufficient to constitute a ground for divorce. The argument urged by appellant that the evidence proves a con-donation after most of the acts of misconduct were committed is met by the fact that it also proves a renewal of such acts after the mutual pledges which are claimed to constitute-the condonation. It is entirely well established that con-donation of marital…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Von Trott v. Von TrottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Consaul v. LoenneckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Phillips v. PhillipsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  4. MacCarthy v. WhitcombWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Roelke v. RoelkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gauger v. GaugerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  2. White v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Gordon v. GordonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Cudahy v. CudahyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Hiecke v. HieckeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API