Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 19, 1996PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

This is an appeal by Sidney V. Blecker from the order of the Commonwealth Court reversing the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board granting benefits for a psychic injury claimed to have been caused by his employment as an attorney with the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission. The Commonwealth Court held that Blecker was not entitled to workers’ compensation benefits because he had failed to establish that his psychic injury was caused by abnormal working conditions. For the following reasons, we affirm.

The scope of appellate review in workers’…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Volterano v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Wilson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Blecker v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Davis v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Payes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Pa Liquor Control Board v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Scott v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Miller v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API