Legal Opinion
Rutt v. Poudre Education Ass'n
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided July 20, 2006No. 05CA1718PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROTHENBERG.
This administrative appeal addresses whether respondents, Colorado Education Association (the CEA) and Poudre Education Association (the PEA), violated the Campaign and Political Finance Amendment, Colo. Const, art. XXVIII (the Amendment), and § 1-45-117, C.R.S.2005, of the Fair Practices Act in conducting certain campaign activity in the 2004 election. Because we conclude the CEA and the PEA violated the Amendment, we reverse the order of the administrative law judge (ALJ) and remand the case for further proceedings.
I. Background
In 2005, as relevant here,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Karin Sofia Ohlander, in the Matter of Julia Larson, a Minor Child, F/k/a Karin Sofia Larson v. Mark Andrew LarsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Colorado Education Ass'n v. RuttSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Alliance for Colorado's Families v. GilbertColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Colorado Republican Party v. WilliamsColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Combs v. Jaguar Energy Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2016