Colorado Education Ass'n v. Rutt
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender
I. Introduction
We granted certiorari in Rutt v. Poudre Education Ass'n, 151 P.3d 585 (Colo.App.2006), to determine whether the court of appeals correctly reversed the administrative law judge's decision to dismiss Wayne Rutt and Paul Marrick's (collectively, "Rutt") complaint against the Colorado Education Association and Poudre Education Association based on the court of appeals' conclusion that the unions coordinated campaign activities with Bob Bacon's campaign for state senate, and thus made illegal contributions to the campaign in violation of article XXVIII of the Colorado Constitution.1
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McConnell v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Eu v. San Francisco County Democratic Central CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Dallman v. RitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- Patterson Recall Committee, Inc. v. PattersonColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Cerbo v. Protect Colorado Jobs, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Colorado Ethics Watch v. Independent Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- Lambert v. Ritter Inaugural Committee, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.