Legal Opinion

Bogart v. Phillips

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1897PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from St. Clair; Vance, J. Bill by Belmont D. Bogart, administrator of the estate of Adam W. Bogart, deceased, against Abram Phillips, Bostwick R. Noble, and John Holden, to foreclose a mortgage. Foreclosure was awarded, but a personal decree against the defendant Noble was refused. Complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is a bill filed to foreclose a mortgage made by Phillips to Adam W. Bogart, complainant’s intestate, on the 13th of October, 1887. About February 13, 1889, Bogart had brought suit against Phillips to recover about $300 interest then due, and, by *698appointment, Phillips was to meet Bogart at Port Huron and settle up this back interest. Phillips went to Noble, and borrowed $300 from him to pay Bogart, giving Noble his note and a deed of the land covered by the mortgage to Bogart. It was agreed between Phillips and Noble that Phillips should come to Port Huron and make the settlement with…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eppes v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  2. Fishback v. J. C. Forkner Fig Gardens, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Hammond v. BarnardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Hamilton Co. v. RosenSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1937
  5. Schmitt v. MerrimanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API